Veralogiq · FTC Launchpad

FTC Launchpad · Practice & judging

Practice questions

Answer out loud first Then reveal
What is the difference between autonomous and tele-op?

Sample:

  • Autonomous — pre-written code runs by itself
  • Tele-op — driver + gamepad during the match
Name two reasons a team might use sensors.

Sample (any two):

  • Stop at a set distance
  • Line up on a target
  • Detect a game piece
  • Know how far the robot turned
  • Avoid hitting something
What is a drivetrain?

Sample: The system of wheels and motors that moves the robot around the field.

What does “gear ratio” affect?

Sample:

  • Tradeoff: speed vs torque
  • More torque → often less speed (same motor)
Why do teams keep an engineering notebook or portfolio?

Sample:

  • Show: tried → iterated → changed → why
  • Learn + explain the robot to judges
What is Gracious Professionalism in one sentence?

Sample: Competing seriously while staying respectful, honest, and helpful to others.

What is one safety habit in the shop?

Sample (any one):

  • Tie hair back
  • Safety glasses when required
  • Hands off moving parts
  • Ask before a new tool
What is CAD used for on an FTC team?

Sample:

  • 3D design before metal / plastic
  • Check fit
  • Share ideas with the team
What is special about mecanum wheels?

Sample: They have rollers at an angle so the robot can strafe sideways on a flat floor if the code and driving are set up for it.

If you don’t know an answer during tryouts, what can you say?

Sample: “I’m not sure yet—could you explain it?” or “I’d like to learn that—here’s what I think so far…”

Bonus: write 3 questions for your team:

  • Schedule / meetings
  • Expectations for new members
  • How beginners learn

Good questions = mature.

Engineering portfolio

The engineering portfolio is a written document you submit before competitions. Judges read it before your interview — a strong portfolio wins awards and impresses alliance partners.

What goes in the portfolio

  • Team introduction — members, roles, how you communicate, team culture.
  • Design process — how you identified what the robot needs to do; what constraints you faced (time, parts, skills).
  • Mechanism design — sketches, CAD screenshots, or photos of each major mechanism with a short explanation of why you chose that approach over alternatives.
  • Iteration log — what didn't work, what you changed, and why. Judges value honest iteration over a "perfect robot" story.
  • Software & autonomous strategy — brief overview of your programming approach and auto path choices.
  • Outreach & community — demos, workshops, team events, partnerships with STEM programs.
  • Lessons learned / next steps — what would you do differently? What's on the backlog?

Format tips

  • Typical length: 15–25 pages (no official max, but be concise).
  • Use photos and diagrams — judges skim; pictures explain faster than paragraphs.
  • Label every photo: "Front intake, iteration 3 — added compliant wheels to reduce jams."
  • Consistent fonts, colors, and headers make it look professional and easy to navigate.
  • Export as PDF before the submission deadline.

When to write it

  • Don't write it the night before — engineers log each week as they build.
  • Assign a "documentation lead" who takes photos at every practice and drafts a short paragraph per session.
  • Use a shared Google Doc or Notion so all members can contribute.
  • Lock and format the final PDF at least 2 days before the submission deadline.
  • Think Award is primarily based on your portfolio — document every design decision now, not at the end of the season.
  • Inspire Award (best overall) requires a great portfolio plus a great interview — start both early.

Judging & presentation (quick refs)

Formats vary by event—adapt with your coach.

Display & slides

  • Many formats work: poster board, PowerPoint (bring extension cords/batteries), talking + demo; you can combine.
  • Optional display board: team name/number, photo, robot design, strategy, outreach, sponsors—helps pit judges and alliance partners.
  • Slides: lots of pictures/diagrams; most explanation is spoken; clear, not empty or overwhelming; use as many slides as you need.

Formal interview

  • Often ~5 min presentation + ~5 min Q&A; judges may stop you at time; whole team present; 2–3 judges.
  • Tips: everyone speaks briefly, know your key points well, practice as a team, point at the robot when describing parts. The judges are there to learn about your work, not to catch you out.

Q&A and pit

  • Q&A can cover design, outreach, team dynamics, what you learned—practice answers; delegate by expertise (leads handle the hardest questions).
  • Pit: judges walk the pit; more visits can mean award consideration; have a “runner” to fetch the right teammate; short highlights welcome.
← Code + build Practice & judging CAD →